Lab 2 - Ohm's Law
Comments about the lab reports ---
About the graphs and slope etc. --
I. In any graph, you should always connnect the points by either
a
line or a curve depending on what you expect the graph to
look
like.
II. To find the slope, always draw a line, choose two points
ON THAT LINE, and find the slope. Never use just two data
points ( unless they happen to fall exactly on the line ).
III. Always show which points you've chosen to find the slope and
show
the calculations.
IV. Using the V vs. I graphs for light bulb and resistor, you had
to show which of the two is ohmic and which is non-ohmic.
V. Comparison of the V vs I graphs and P vs I^2 graphs -
Using the eqution V = (R)(I) , we see that the slope of
V:I graph is R. Also, Using P = (R)(I^2), we can infer that
the slope of P:I^2 graph is also R. Further, for a given
resistor,
they should look the same - because, if the resistor is
ohmic,
both V:I and P:I^2 graphs will have constant slope,
while if
it's non-ohmic, they'll both be similar looking curves.
XIII. Some of you had a wrong scale on the x-axis for the P vs
I^2
graph. ( Well, i can't explain what's meant by a wrong
scale
without a graph paper and as my computer familiarity is
pretty
limited, i can't include one in this document. So see me if
you
have further question. )
VI. You had to mention why you chose the points that you chose to
to find the slope with.
I expected you to see that the light bulb graph is a curve
and
it has two linear parts, one before it starts glowing and one
after. If you find the slope in the part after it starts
glowing,
the value is vastly different from the value measured by the
DMM.
So, that should give you a hint that you should find the
slope
in the first part of the graph and compare that value with
the DMM value.
B2. This was bonus for mentioning the correct reason for the
non-ohmic
behaviour of the light-bulb. When the light bulb starts
glowing,
it's temperature rises and change in temperature changes the
resistance. So you'll see that the slope before it starts
glowing
is nearly equal to the value found from DMM when the bulb was
cold.
About the calculations and verifying Kirchoff's laws --
VII. For both the circuits, you had to find the value of
individual
resistances for R1, R2, R3 and compare it with the one you
measured with DMM.
VIII. Calculating equivalent resistance correctly -
For circuit 2, it was just the sum of R1, R2, R3.
For circuit 3, 1/R = 1/R2 + 1/R3 gives the equivalent
resistance of R2 and R3. Then, the total equivalent
resistance
is the sum of R1 and R. i.e. Req = R + R1.
IX. The total resistance of the circuit as measured was
Rt = Vps / Ips where Vps and Ips are voltage across and
current through the power supply.
X. You had to compare the Req (see VIII.) with the Rt(see IX.)
XI. Whenever you compare two values, you must mention the %
error
( or % discrepency or % difference or whatever else you
might
choose to call it,) because "5.2 is close to 5.6" is not
very meaningful.
XII. You had to show that the data DIRECTLY verifies the
Kirchoff's
laws. There were three main checks -
1. The sum of voltages in a loop should add up to zero,
which means that
for circuit 2, sum of voltages across R1, R2 and R3
should
add up to voltage of the power supply.
for circuit 3, Sum of voltages across R1 and R2 should
add
up to voltage of the power supply.
2. Since R2 and R3 and in parallel in circuit 3, the
voltage
law implies that the voltages across R2 and R3 should
be same.
3. Using the current law, the current in R1 must be equal
to
the sum of currents through R2 and R3. ( for circuit
3).
E-mail :
apte@physics.utexas.edu